The path to room-temperature superconductivity: A programmatic approach
TL;DR
Room-temperature superconductivity, a game-changer for technology, is still a tough puzzle, but advancements in prediction and engineering could help solve it. By improving our understanding of how to create new superconductors and control their properties, we might soon unlock this incredible phenomenon that can enhance energy efficiency and revolutionize many technologies.
Room-temperature superconductivity is arguably the greatest challenge in condensed matter physics, with significant practical and commercial implications if it can be solved. There are no physical laws preventing this from occurring; indeed, superconductivity has been observed in so many different materials under so many different conditions that it is almost a "generic" property of nonmagnetic metals. This guides our viewpoint that high-temperature superconductivity is possible, if difficult to realize. Here, we lay out two grand challenges facing the field, titled the Prediction Challenge and the Engineering Challenge, and put forward a programmatic approach for overcoming them. The Prediction Challenge addresses the fact that our ability to predict new conventional superconductors has dramatically advanced in recent years, but most predicted materials are not experimentally synthesizable. To address this challenge, we propose a shift from modeling the superconducting critical temperature and dynamic stability toward high-throughput ab initio and predictive thermodynamics/synthesis modeling. The Engineering Challenge describes how we can control superconductivity with various "knobs," including pressure, nanostructuring, and light. However, our ability to predict how a specific knob will modify a given superconductor is limited, making it difficult to fully exploit them. We describe the current status and identify areas where additional work is needed to fully exploit six of the most common knobs. Progress in both of these grand challenges, while closely integrating theory and experiment into a continuous feedback loop and incorporating insights from fields beyond physics and materials science, could unlock the underlying keys to room-temperature superconductivity.
- 1High-temperature superconductivity is theoretically possible for many materials, but practical challenges remain in making it happen.
- 2There are two main obstacles in achieving room-temperature superconductivity: the Prediction Challenge and the Engineering Challenge.
- 3Current predictions of new superconductors often fall short because many predicted materials can’t be experimentally created.
- 4A new approach using advanced models and thermodynamics can help identify which materials can actually be synthesized as superconductors.
- 5Controlling superconductivity may involve changing external conditions like pressure, nanostructuring, and light, but understanding their effects is still limited.
M87's black hole flipped its magnetic field
Imagine a bar magnet with a north and south pole. Now imagine that magnet suddenly flipping so north becomes south and vice versa. That's essentially what happened with the magnetic field around the giant black hole at the center of galaxy M87 — except this black hole is 6.5 billion times heavier than our Sun. Scientists noticed this flip by watching the powerful beam of energy, called a jet, that shoots out from the black hole. The direction and behavior of that beam changed in a way that revealed the magnetic field had reversed. It's a big deal because those magnetic fields are thought to act like the engine that powers and steers these cosmic jets, and we've rarely caught one flipping in action.
The 2026 World Cup's grass is an engineering problem
Imagine you're trying to play soccer in 16 different places across the United States, Canada, and Mexico — some in freezing cold, some blazing hot, some in stadiums with roofs that block sunlight. Half of those stadiums normally use fake grass. Now FIFA, the organization that runs the World Cup, wants every single pitch to feel and play exactly the same way, like a video game where every level has identical physics. To do that, they hired grass scientists — yes, that's a real job — who figured out how to grow special grass on thin mats with plastic underneath so it can be transported like a carpet, stitched with synthetic fibers so it doesn't rip when players sprint and tackle, and tested by literally shooting balls at it with a cannon to make sure it bounces right. Different grass species are used depending on whether a stadium is hot, cool, or dark. It's basically a giant, living, high-tech floor installation that has to survive the world's best athletes running on it.
Non-Mendelian inheritance of DNA methylation patterns in mice
Imagine your DNA is like a huge book of instructions. Mendel's laws are the normal rules for how chapters of that book get passed from parents to children. But there's also a layer of sticky notes on top of the book—called epigenetic marks—that tell cells which chapters to read and which to ignore. This study found that most of the time (about 93%), these sticky notes follow the normal inheritance rules. But about 7% of the time, they do something unexpected: new patterns appear that neither parent had, or a mark from one parent somehow silences the same mark from the other parent (called paramutation), or males and females end up with completely different sticky notes even when they inherit the same DNA. Scientists discovered this by using a new ultra-precise DNA reading technology in mice, and it opens the door to understanding hidden layers of how traits—and possibly diseases—are passed down through generations.
Remarks on the disproof of the unit distance conjecture
Imagine you scatter a bunch of dots on a piece of paper. The question is: how many pairs of those dots can be exactly 1 inch apart? The Erdős unit distance conjecture asked whether there's a specific mathematical formula that limits how often this can happen as you add more and more dots. Think of it like asking how many friendships can exist in a town where friends are defined as people who live exactly one mile apart — there's a suspected maximum, and Erdős guessed what that maximum should be. For decades, no one could prove or disprove his guess. Now, an AI apparently found a specific arrangement of dots (a 'counterexample') that breaks the expected limit, proving Erdős's conjecture was wrong. A team of elite mathematicians then checked and explained the AI's work in this paper.