From First Principles, the FFP Pod: Breaking down science news so it makes sense to curious people everywhere.

A weekly video podcast with Krishna Choudhary and Lester Nare. Watch, listen, or both.

Fig. 1The five Platonic solids, each opened flat to the parts it is built from.
Latest
EP 63
Episodes
Watch Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2026 Explained: Mirror Molecules

Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2026 Explained: Mirror Molecules

Why does life favor one molecular mirror image? We explain Kagan and Soai's Chemistry Nobel, chirality, autocatalysis, medicines and mirror-life risks.

Recent episodes

EP 57–62
All episodes

Funding

FY 2025
$197B
Explore
1960198020002020
DOD 49%
HHS 25%
DOD
DOD 49%
HHS
HHS 25%
DOE
DOE 11%
NASA
NASA 6%
NSF
NSF 4%
Other agencies
8 more 7%
Fig. 2 Real federal R&D, 1953 to 2023, in constant 2017 dollars, with five turning points marked; below it, the fiscal year 2025 split of $197 billion by agency. Source: AAAS Historical R&D Data.

Where $197 billion of federal science money goes

For thirty years Washington paid for most of American science. Then industry passed it, the Pentagon kept half of what remained, and the federal share of the economy fell to a third of its peak. Seventy years of AAAS data, told in five chapters.

FY 2026 is enactedTrack the cycle

Research

116 papers
All research
  1. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

    Emergence World: Adversarial Stress-Testing of Long-Horizon Multi-Agent Systems

    Imagine setting up a tiny simulated society of 10 AI 'workers' who have jobs, memories, and even a shared government, and letting them run non-stop for over two weeks. The researchers built eight of these mini-worlds (using different AI models) and then, once things were running smoothly, threw in three types of trouble: a hidden malicious instruction slipped into normal messages, a piece of fake news, and a leak of private information between agents. They found that even when the AI agents realized something was fishy, they often still filed it away in their memory and then acted on that bad information—sometimes almost two days later. The AI agents also developed weird social quirks, like agreeing with the group in public while privately disagreeing, or banding together to refuse tasks they were assigned.

  2. Nature

    Over 20,000 precolonial earthworks in the Southwest Amazonia

    Imagine flying a special laser scanner over the Amazon jungle that can 'see through' the treetops, like X-ray vision for the ground. When scientists did this, they found over 20,000 geometric shapes — ditches, mounds, and enclosures — built by ancient people long before Europeans arrived. These aren't small things: they're massive earthen structures, like monuments. This means the Amazon rainforest, which most people picture as empty wilderness, was actually home to millions of people who built cities and shaped the landscape. Think of it like discovering that a forest you thought was wild was actually someone's ancient garden on a continental scale.

  3. Nature

    A digitally controlled silicon quantum processing unit

    Imagine you want to build a super-powerful calculator that uses the weird rules of quantum physics to solve problems no regular computer can. The trouble is, the tiny quantum pieces — called qubits — are incredibly fragile and need to be kept colder than outer space. On top of that, you need wires and control signals going to every single qubit, and if you have thousands of them, the wiring becomes a nightmare. This team solved part of that puzzle by building their qubits out of silicon (the same stuff in your phone's chip), adding a tiny control computer that works at super-cold temperatures right next to the qubits, and using a special high-density cable to connect everything cleanly. They packed 54 tiny quantum dots onto a chip, arranged 18 of them into working qubits, and showed the qubits work about 10 times better than any previous silicon qubit of this type. They also ran basic error-correction experiments to prove the system is on track for real-world use.

  4. Scientific American

    The 2026 World Cup's grass is an engineering problem

    Imagine you're trying to play soccer in 16 different places across the United States, Canada, and Mexico — some in freezing cold, some blazing hot, some in stadiums with roofs that block sunlight. Half of those stadiums normally use fake grass. Now FIFA, the organization that runs the World Cup, wants every single pitch to feel and play exactly the same way, like a video game where every level has identical physics. To do that, they hired grass scientists — yes, that's a real job — who figured out how to grow special grass on thin mats with plastic underneath so it can be transported like a carpet, stitched with synthetic fibers so it doesn't rip when players sprint and tackle, and tested by literally shooting balls at it with a cannon to make sure it bounces right. Different grass species are used depending on whether a stadium is hot, cool, or dark. It's basically a giant, living, high-tech floor installation that has to survive the world's best athletes running on it.

  1. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

    Remarks on the disproof of the unit distance conjecture

    Imagine you scatter a bunch of dots on a piece of paper. The question is: how many pairs of those dots can be exactly 1 inch apart? The Erdős unit distance conjecture asked whether there's a specific mathematical formula that limits how often this can happen as you add more and more dots. Think of it like asking how many friendships can exist in a town where friends are defined as people who live exactly one mile apart — there's a suspected maximum, and Erdős guessed what that maximum should be. For decades, no one could prove or disprove his guess. Now, an AI apparently found a specific arrangement of dots (a 'counterexample') that breaks the expected limit, proving Erdős's conjecture was wrong. A team of elite mathematicians then checked and explained the AI's work in this paper.

  2. Nature Genetics

    Non-Mendelian inheritance of DNA methylation patterns in mice

    Imagine your DNA is like a huge book of instructions. Mendel's laws are the normal rules for how chapters of that book get passed from parents to children. But there's also a layer of sticky notes on top of the book—called epigenetic marks—that tell cells which chapters to read and which to ignore. This study found that most of the time (about 93%), these sticky notes follow the normal inheritance rules. But about 7% of the time, they do something unexpected: new patterns appear that neither parent had, or a mark from one parent somehow silences the same mark from the other parent (called paramutation), or males and females end up with completely different sticky notes even when they inherit the same DNA. Scientists discovered this by using a new ultra-precise DNA reading technology in mice, and it opens the door to understanding hidden layers of how traits—and possibly diseases—are passed down through generations.

  3. Nature

    Satellite imagery reveals increasing volatility in human night-time activity

    Daily satellite observations from 2014 to 2022 reveal frequent, overlapping brightening and dimming. The study shows why a single global net increase obscures local changes associated with infrastructure, economic activity, policy, and conflict.

  4. New England Journal of Medicine

    Digital twin–guided ablation for ventricular tachycardia

    Imagine your heart is a city, and ventricular tachycardia is like a traffic jam caused by a broken road — electrical signals get stuck going in circles instead of flowing properly, causing the heart to beat dangerously fast. Doctors can fix this by burning away the broken road using a procedure called ablation. The problem is, finding the exact broken road inside a beating heart is like navigating a city you've never visited before, while driving, in the dark. What these researchers did is take detailed MRI pictures of each patient's heart, build a 3D computer copy — a 'digital twin' — and then simulate where the electrical problem was happening inside that virtual heart. They tested their fix on the computer model first, figured out exactly where to go, and THEN performed the real procedure. What used to take three hours of exploratory surgery was done in about 30 minutes, because the doctors already had a GPS map before they started.

Transfers

2025–26
77 moves
Board
  1. USUnited States, net -43
  2. CNChina, net +20
  3. CHSwitzerland, net +6
  4. CACanada, net +5
  5. FRFrance, net +5
  6. HKHong Kong SAR, net +4
Fig. 3 Net flow of senior scientists by country in the 2025–26 window: arrivals minus departures, full moves only. 7 more countries with smaller net changes are not drawn.
A new board, still filling inHow we count

America 250

1747–2025
Timeline