Behavioural improvements with thalamic stimulation after severe traumatic brain injury
TL;DR
Imagine your brain is like a city, and consciousness is like the city's power grid. After a really bad brain injury, it's not that the buildings (brain regions) are all destroyed — some of them are still standing, just with the lights off because the power lines connecting them got damaged. The thalamus is like the city's central power relay station. In this study, scientists implanted tiny electrodes deep in the brain of a man who had been in a minimally conscious state — barely aware of the world — for 6 years after a car accident. By sending small electrical pulses to his thalamus, they essentially 'turned the lights back on' in parts of his brain that had gone dark. During periods when the stimulator was switched on, he could do things he couldn't do before: follow instructions, use his limbs more purposefully, and even eat food by mouth. When they switched it off, those abilities faded. It's like finding out that some 'broken' appliances in the city just needed the power reconnected.
Widespread loss of cerebral connectivity is assumed to underlie the failure of brain mechanisms that support communication and goal-directed behaviour following severe traumatic brain injury. Disorders of consciousness that persist for longer than 12 months after severe traumatic brain injury are generally considered to be immutable; no treatment has been shown to accelerate recovery or improve functional outcome in such cases. Recent studies have shown unexpected preservation of large-scale cerebral networks in patients in the minimally conscious state (MCS), a condition that is characterized by intermittent evidence of awareness of self or the environment. These findings indicate that there might be residual functional capacity in some patients that could be supported by therapeutic interventions. We hypothesize that further recovery in some patients in the MCS is limited by chronic underactivation of potentially recruitable large-scale networks. Here, in a 6-month double-blind alternating crossover study, we show that bilateral deep brain electrical stimulation (DBS) of the central thalamus modulates behavioural responsiveness in a patient who remained in MCS for 6 yr following traumatic brain injury before the intervention. The frequency of specific cognitively mediated behaviours (primary outcome measures) and functional limb control and oral feeding (secondary outcome measures) increased during periods in which DBS was on as compared with periods in which it was off. Logistic regression modelling shows a statistical linkage between the observed functional improvements and recent stimulation history. We interpret the DBS effects as compensating for a loss of arousal regulation that is normally controlled by the frontal lobe in the intact brain. These findings provide evidence that DBS can promote significant late functional recovery from severe traumatic brain injury. Our observations, years after the injury occurred, challenge the existing practice of early treatment discontinuation for patients with only inconsistent interactive behaviours and motivate further research to develop therapeutic interventions.
- 1Bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the central thalamus modulated behavioural responsiveness in a patient who had remained in the minimally conscious state for 6 years following traumatic brain injury.
- 2In a 6-month double-blind alternating crossover study, cognitively mediated behaviours increased during DBS-on periods compared to DBS-off periods.
- 3Functional limb control and oral feeding (secondary outcome measures) also improved during active stimulation periods.
- 4Logistic regression modelling demonstrated a statistical linkage between observed functional improvements and recent stimulation history.
- 5The findings challenge the existing practice of early treatment discontinuation for patients with only inconsistent interactive behaviours after severe TBI.
The 2026 World Cup's grass is an engineering problem
Imagine you're trying to play soccer in 16 different places across the United States, Canada, and Mexico — some in freezing cold, some blazing hot, some in stadiums with roofs that block sunlight. Half of those stadiums normally use fake grass. Now FIFA, the organization that runs the World Cup, wants every single pitch to feel and play exactly the same way, like a video game where every level has identical physics. To do that, they hired grass scientists — yes, that's a real job — who figured out how to grow special grass on thin mats with plastic underneath so it can be transported like a carpet, stitched with synthetic fibers so it doesn't rip when players sprint and tackle, and tested by literally shooting balls at it with a cannon to make sure it bounces right. Different grass species are used depending on whether a stadium is hot, cool, or dark. It's basically a giant, living, high-tech floor installation that has to survive the world's best athletes running on it.
Non-Mendelian inheritance of DNA methylation patterns in mice
Imagine your DNA is like a huge book of instructions. Mendel's laws are the normal rules for how chapters of that book get passed from parents to children. But there's also a layer of sticky notes on top of the book—called epigenetic marks—that tell cells which chapters to read and which to ignore. This study found that most of the time (about 93%), these sticky notes follow the normal inheritance rules. But about 7% of the time, they do something unexpected: new patterns appear that neither parent had, or a mark from one parent somehow silences the same mark from the other parent (called paramutation), or males and females end up with completely different sticky notes even when they inherit the same DNA. Scientists discovered this by using a new ultra-precise DNA reading technology in mice, and it opens the door to understanding hidden layers of how traits—and possibly diseases—are passed down through generations.
Adversarial AI reveals mechanisms and treatments for disorders of consciousness
Imagine your brain is like a city with millions of roads and traffic systems. When you're awake and conscious, traffic flows in complex, coordinated patterns. In a coma, something has gone wrong — but we've never had a great way to figure out exactly which roads are broken or how to fix them. This study built a very smart AI that learned to tell the difference between 'awake brain' and 'coma brain' by studying hundreds of thousands of brainwave recordings. Then, like a detective, the AI was pitted against a simulated model of the brain to figure out: what changes in the brain's wiring would explain the difference? The AI figured out — on its own, without being told — that two key things go wrong in a coma: a specific circuit deep in the brain (called the basal ganglia indirect pathway) gets disrupted, and the brain's 'braking system' (inhibitory neurons) starts working too hard in the wrong places. The researchers then checked these predictions against real patient data, and both checked out. The AI also suggested that zapping a specific deep brain region with high-frequency electrical pulses might help wake people up — and early evidence from human patients supports this idea.
Trionda: Enhanced Surface Roughness Relative to Previous FIFA World Cup Match Balls
Imagine throwing a ball through air. The air pushes back on the ball, slowing it down—that's called drag. But something interesting happens: at a certain speed, the air flowing around the ball switches from a smooth, lazy flow to a chaotic, turbulent flow, and paradoxically the ball actually experiences LESS drag in that turbulent zone. Think of it like a golf ball—those dimples are there precisely to trigger this turbulence early and make the ball fly farther. The speed at which this switch happens is called the 'critical speed' or 'drag crisis.' Scientists put the Trionda ball in a wind tunnel—basically a giant fan tube—and measured exactly how much air resistance it faces at different speeds. They found that Trionda's surface is effectively rougher than most previous World Cup balls, meaning it hits that drag crisis switch at a lower speed (11.9 meters per second, roughly 27 mph). In plain terms, Trionda behaves more predictably in flight than some past balls, but very long, powerful kicks may travel slightly shorter distances than they would have with previous balls.